« Bike Rides for Black Rock | Main | Edible Installations at Eyebeam »

How To Pay For New Transportation Infrastructure? Congestion Tolling.

Posted by Thor Ritz, Contributing Writer

The good people over at Streetsblog posted a nice piece yesterday on a new poll which suggests that the public favors congestion tolling as a means to pay for new transportation infrastructure.  The article yeilds plenty of useful insights, but I am left wondering about who exactly was polled in this study.  As a reader commented, it's pretty clear that the majority of respondents are not public transit riders.  It is certainly signficant that 33% were unwilling to pay anything and that an additional 30% favor raising public transit fares.  Sure, the study might help to jumpstart a broader conversation about tolling, but it seems to indicate that we've still got a lot of work to do if we want to convince the general public that this is the best direction to head in. 

The puzzle of how to pay for new federal investments in transportation is the single greatest stumbling block facing members of Congress -- should a gas tax increase be combined with a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax? How about a national infrastructure bank that leverages private capital?

A poll released today by the engineering firm HNTB suggests that higher gas taxes could continue to face political headwinds from both sides of the aisle, even after the recession begins to ease.

A 10-cent gas tax increase that would be imposed only after two straight quarters of economic growth faced opposition from 64 percent of respondents, and just 16 percent said gas taxes should be raised to pay for "roads and bridges."

But the poll found strikingly strong support for tolling, particularly congestion tolling through HOT (high-occupancy toll) lanes. One-third of respondents said HOT lanes should be used for future transportation revenue, with 35 percent supporting the use of public tolling and 20 percent backing private tolls.

Read more here.

Posted on Sep 2, 2009 by Registered CommenterThe Green Queen Bee | Comments4 Comments

Reader Comments (4)

I would agree to a toll if they were extra careful to make sure that the toll booth was not a source of extra congestion. If they were to make it quick and digital then I would be more than happy to pay my fair share for the high speed rail network.

-Tyler
September 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPortland Real Estate
Really good article, really instructiv. And Tyler I agree with u. Thanks for the post !
September 3, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPetit Joffrey
I'm shoked! I see in <a href='http://google.com'>google.com</a>
SDGTR23YHT234FD
September 30, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterOpiquePiefe
Since I moved to the burbs (long island) I am in nyc much less. I dont like taking the LIRR at night, so often I drive in. this is espcially the case in winter off-peak. In the summer I hate driving so the LIRR is fine - boy I miss the subways (when they worked well)!

increasing the tax on gasoline should be done at first, but its a difficult argument that those funds should be spent on mass transit - more likely they should go to road/bridge work.

congestion pricing revenue should go to mass transit - and it is sorely needed in many place in the tri-state area. Driving around here on 'parkways' is miserable! 1hr to go 25miles.

the costs of public transportation should be vastly reduced by aggressive costs cutting. why do transit workers get a pension? better benefits? the benefit of the few is costing us all - we need more equitable costs - I dont care about unions at this point. NYC will quickly go broke at this rate.

Additionally, albany has been funneling money away from nyc for years - time to collect!!
October 30, 2009 | Unregistered Commentermosesnbklyn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.